Actionable indecency

Uses your system voice; voice and rate in settings.

Snapshot

≈ 2 min read

Names in other languages

No names in other languages are held for this entry yet.

Article bodies are English and are not machine-translated. A name in another language is not a translation of the article.

Actionable indecency is a legal doctrine held by the Federal Communications Commission since the 1978 FCC vs. Pacifica case, that broadcast speech can be regulated even if it does not contain the seven dirty words deemed "indecent". The FCC states on its website that indecent broadcasts are not actionable between 10 PM and 6 AM; however, in 1987, it announced that "actionable indecency" had been committed in broadcasts after 10 PM.

Actionable indecency is a legal doctrine held by the Federal Communications Commission since the 1978 FCC vs. Pacifica case, that broadcast speech can be regulated even if it does not contain the seven dirty words deemed "indecent". The FCC states on its website that indecent broadcasts are not actionable between 10 PM and 6 AM; however, in 1987, it announced that "actionable indecency" had been committed in broadcasts after 10 PM.

Criticism of legal basis

Legal scholars have questioned the constitutionality of the doctrine, and indicated that it has been used to silence minorities such as gay men in the past. One legal analysis of the doctrine found that it may no longer be necessary for the FCC itself to exist in order to protect children in the age of new media.

See also

Cause of action Actionable Offenses: Indecent Phonograph Recordings from the 1890s

References

Notes

Sources

Text derived from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1305341652 under CC BY-SA 4.0; modifications have been made.

Provenance

snapshot enwiki-001305341652 · captured 1754914074.0 · version history

Cite this page as: encyclopegia.org, “Actionable indecency”, snapshot enwiki-001305341652. https://encyclopegia.org/a/actionable-indecency

Sources cited in this revision

No external citation was extracted for this revision. That is a statement about the source, not a claim that none exists.