Lesson plan
Amphineuron
genus of plants
Article summary
genus of plants
Key claims
- P105: Q34740 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P12764: Q17278822 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P1421: https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxonomygenus.aspx?id=17519 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P171: Q1496479 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P1727: 101466 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P1843: 大金星蕨属 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P2036: 201645 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P225: Amphineuron — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P31: Q16521 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P31: Q1040689 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P3151: 427902 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P373: Amphineuron — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P5037: urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:17427050-1 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P5055: 1261930 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P5984: 86531 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P6756: Amphineuron — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P6802: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Amphineuron%20opulentum%20%28Kaulf.%29%20Holtt.%20%28AM%20AK355588-1%29.jpg — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P7715: wfo-4000001724 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P846: 4079603 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P8468: 14055 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P910: Q61242889 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P960: 40012636 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
- P961: 17427050-1 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
Discussion questions
- Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
- The record states that the P105 is "Q34740". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P12764 is "Q17278822". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P1421 is "https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxonomygenus.aspx?id=17519". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P171 is "Q1496479". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P1727 is "101466". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P1843 is "大金星蕨属". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P2036 is "201645". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P225 is "Amphineuron". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P31 is "Q16521". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P31 is "Q1040689". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P3151 is "427902". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P373 is "Amphineuron". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P5037 is "urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:17427050-1". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P5055 is "1261930". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P5984 is "86531". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P6756 is "Amphineuron". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P6802 is "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Amphineuron%20opulentum%20%28Kaulf.%29%20Holtt.%20%28AM%20AK355588-1%29.jpg". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P7715 is "wfo-4000001724". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P846 is "4079603". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P8468 is "14055". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P910 is "Q61242889". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P960 is "40012636". What evidence would count against this claim?
- The record states that the P961 is "17427050-1". What evidence would count against this claim?
- Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
- If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?
Bibliography
No sources recorded.
Key claims and bibliography are generated from the same tracked claims and sources as the article page.