Basdahl

Uses your system voice; voice and rate in settings.

Snapshot

≈ 1 min read

Names in other languages

No names in other languages are held for this entry yet.

Article bodies are English and are not machine-translated. A name in another language is not a translation of the article.

Basdahl is a municipality in the district of Rotenburg, in Lower Saxony, Germany.

Basdahl is a municipality in the district of Rotenburg, in Lower Saxony, Germany.

History

Basdahl belonged to the Prince-Archbishopric of Bremen, established in 11801. Its parliament, the Bremian Estates ( ), convened in diets (Tohopesaten or Landtage) usually in Basdahl, with Bremervörde serving as capital with the prince-archiepiscopal residence and seat of government (as of 1219). The Bremian chapter had its seat in the city of Bremen. In 1648 the Prince-Archbishopric was transformed into the Duchy of Bremen, which was first ruled in personal union by the Swedish Crown - interrupted by a Danish occupation (1712–1715) - and from 1715 on by the Hanoverian Crown. The estates met then much less frequent, because the Swedish rulers tried to discard the estates influence in legislation. In 1807 the ephemeric Kingdom of Westphalia annexed the Duchy, before France annexed it in 1810. In 1813 the Duchy was restored to the Electorate of Hanover, which - after its upgrade to the Kingdom of Hanover in 1814 - incorporated the Duchy in a real union and the Ducal territory, including Basdahl, became part of the new Stade Region, established in 18231. Basdahl's historical role in the prince-archbishopric is commemorated in its coat-of-arms showing on the left side the crisscrossed keys, the coat-of-arms of the prince-archbishopric.

References

Text derived from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1377573097 under CC BY-SA 4.0; modifications have been made.

References

  1. ↩Wikipedia date of establishment (×2) · confidence 0.95 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1377573097

Sources cited in this revision

No external citation was extracted for this revision. That is a statement about the source, not a claim that none exists.