Besta (computer)

Uses your system voice; voice and rate in settings.

Snapshot

≈ 2 min read

Names in other languages

No names in other languages are held for this entry yet.

Article bodies are English and are not machine-translated. A name in another language is not a translation of the article.

Besta (Беста) is a Soviet Unix-based graphics workstation. Starting in 1988, more than 1,000 were produced. It was produced primarily for use in the Novovoronezh Nuclear Power Plant and some universities. The workstation was designed by students of the Moscow State University in concert with the Scientific Research Institute of System Development. Uniquely, the hardware was manufactured at the ZiL plant, which was better known for producing automotive vehicles and heavy equipment. There were several versions of the computer. Besta-88 has a Motorola 68020 CPU and VME bus. The Bestix operating system is a legally ported version of AT&T UNIX System V Release 3.2.

Besta (Беста) is a Soviet Unix-based graphics workstation. Starting in 1988, more than 1,000 were produced. It was produced primarily for use in the Novovoronezh Nuclear Power Plant and some universities. The workstation was designed by students of the Moscow State University in concert with the Scientific Research Institute of System Development. Uniquely, the hardware was manufactured at the ZiL plant, which was better known for producing automotive vehicles and heavy equipment. There were several versions of the computer. Besta-88 has a Motorola 68020 CPU and VME bus. The Bestix operating system is a legally ported version of AT&T UNIX System V Release 3.2.

External links

«Беста-88», Natalia Dubova (in Russian) Linux in Russia (in Russian) - contains a citation of M. Moshkov on Besta Lib.ru UNIX HOWTOS(in Russian) - Moshkov's hand's on experience with Besta.

Text derived from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1374357877 under CC BY-SA 4.0; modifications have been made.

Sources cited in this revision

No external citation was extracted for this revision. That is a statement about the source, not a claim that none exists.