bird control
≈ 8 min read
Names in other languages
- Françaislutte contre les oiseaux
- РусскийКонтроль птиц
- Englishbird control
- ItalianoBird control
- Nederlandsbird control
- DeutschVogelabwehr
- slnadzor ptic
- 日本語鳥害対策
Article bodies are English and are not machine-translated. A name in another language is not a translation of the article.
on a rooftop in Denmark Bird control or bird abatement involves the methods to eliminate or deter birds from landing, roosting and nesting. Methods of bird control (often called deterrence, dispersal, or hazing) include physical exclusion, visual, auditory, and multi-sensory deterrents, trained dogs or birds of prey (falconry), chemicals, and lethal control. Bird control is frequently used for birds like feral pigeons, blackbirds, geese, and gulls, depending on the area. The most commonly-observed form of bird control may be the bird spikes employed to deter roosting in cities. However, bird control may be desired in several different contexts unrelated to cosmetic concerns in urban areas. Birds are regularly removed or dispersed from airfields to mitigate bird strikes. Avian deterrence is also frequently employed due to crop loss on agricultural fields. In a similar vein, piscivorous birds are frequently controlled on or near aquaculture facilities to mitigate losses. In other contexts, bird control may be used to promote safety for birds, such as deterring them from entering windfarms or from roosting in electrical equipment.
on a rooftop in Denmark Bird control or bird abatement involves the methods to eliminate or deter birds from landing, roosting and nesting. Methods of bird control (often called deterrence, dispersal, or hazing) include physical exclusion, visual, auditory, and multi-sensory deterrents, trained dogs or birds of prey (falconry), chemicals, and lethal control. Bird control is frequently used for birds like feral pigeons, blackbirds, geese, and gulls, depending on the area. The most commonly-observed form of bird control may be the bird spikes employed to deter roosting in cities. However, bird control may be desired in several different contexts unrelated to cosmetic concerns in urban areas. Birds are regularly removed or dispersed from airfields to mitigate bird strikes. Avian deterrence is also frequently employed due to crop loss on agricultural fields. In a similar vein, piscivorous birds are frequently controlled on or near aquaculture facilities to mitigate losses. In other contexts, bird control may be used to promote safety for birds, such as deterring them from entering windfarms or from roosting in electrical equipment.
Methods
Bird control devices fall under two categories: deterrents and exclusions. Deterrents, such as acoustic devices, pyrotechnics, lasers, and bird spikes, discourage birds from landing or roosting in an area by presenting a physical obstacle or causing discomfort and annoyance for the target bird, or otherwise induce neophobia (fear of a novel stimulus). There are fewer exclusion devices, which include bird netting, mesh, and structural modifications, but may also include more intense management options like habitat modification.
Deterrents - Bird Scarers
Visual deterrents may fall into several subcategories, but have the general effect of scaring birds with novel, highly salient visual stimuli. They are often coupled with an additional deterrent, such as limited lethal control. Lights: Presentation of light stimuli have been employed as avian deterrents in several contexts. Pulsing red lights may be an effective deterrent and exclusionary device for waterbirds and corvids. Canada geese appear to be particularly repulsed by blue light. Use of ultraviolet lighting has also been explored; however, some birds are not particularly sensitive to ultraviolet light, making this approach more appropriate for smaller passerines. Lasers: The use of red or green lasers to deter or frighten birds has shown some promise, leading to decreased agricultural losses and immediate departure from a treated area. In some contexts, though, birds which were not initially scared away by laser systems remained in treated areas, indicating that lasers are not completely effective on their own. Lasers may damage avian retinas and cause long-term changes to behaviour and foraging that likely adversely affect birds. Wind-based: Wind-driven scare devices include tapes, balloons, kites, and lightweight spinning turbines propelled by wind. These devices reflect sunlight and in limited uses scare birds that are new to an area. While these devices may initially scare birds away, there has been no demonstration of long-term dispersal using sunlight reflection devices or similar approaches. Acoustic deterrents may be combined with a visual deterrent, or be used alone. They produce loud or otherwise unpleasant noises, designed to scare birds or interrupt their communications. Propane cannons: Propane scare cannons are one of the most common types of bird scarer available in Europe and America. They are propane-powered gas guns which produce a periodic explosion. The audible bang can reach very loud volumes, in excess of 150 decibels, causing a flight reaction in birds. The similarity between a scare cannon and a 12-gauge shotgun is thought to invoke a fear response, although it is also effective against birds that have not been exposed to hunting pressure. Propane cannons are also used for scaring away deer. Birds can become habituated to the sound of regular cannon detonations, especially if it does not vary in its magnitude, pitch, or time interval. However, regularly moving the cannon, utilizing on-demand firing options like radio control, and combining cannons with other methods of deterrents can prevent habituation. Propane cannons can be disruptive to people living nearby due to their volume. One study found that restricting cannon use to hours when birds are active and incorporating better bird damage plans reduced the number of complaints from neighbours. gun bird scarer Pyrotechnics: Pyrotechnic devices may also have a visual component (e.g., flashing), but are primarily intended to scare birds via loud noises. They are generally fired via specialized projectile devices (e.g., pistols) and can emit sounds similar to a shotgun or produce a loud "scream." In a study on double-crested cormorants, pyrotechnics were demonstrated to be equally effective to lethal control in keeping birds out of a treatment area. Sonic deterrents: Sonic avian deterrents are used widely in large, open areas. Sounds include predator cries and distress calls of a variety of birds to discourage pest birds from coming into an area. Common locations for these devices include vineyards, reclamation plants, airports, and other open areas. There are also ultrasonic avian deterrents, which are inaudible to human ears. The use of a "sonic net" – deploying sound within the frequencies of target species calls and communication – has shown promise in deterring European starlings from airfields. In most cases, birds are expected to eventually habituate to sonic repellents, unless they are supplemented with other deterrent techniques.
Deterrents - Predators
Raptors: The use of predatory raptors to disperse prey species is a commonly used bird control method, especially in Europe. In the United States, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), a falconer may request any raptor species protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 (MBTA) to be used for falconry except for golden eagles. The use of bald eagles or golden eagles for abatement is prohibited by the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. All raptors used for abatement must be captive bred and banded with a FWS-issued leg band. Dogs: The control of birds and other wildlife such as deer through harassment by trained border collies has been used at aerodromes, golf courses and agricultural land. The dogs represent an actual threat, and so elicit flight reactions. Habituation is unlikely as they can continually pursue and change their behaviour. In 1999, Southwest Florida International Airport became the first commercial airport in the world to employ a border collie in an airfield wildlife control programme. After the use of the collie, numbers and species of birds on the airport declined and most birds that remained congregated in a drainage ditch away from the runway. The number of bird strikes dropped to zero compared to 13 for the same period the previous year. Several other airports and airbases have now started similar programmes. At Dover Air Force Base, Delaware, bird strike damage to aircraft caused by birds has been reduced from an average of US$600,000 per year for the proceeding two years to US$24,000 per year after the initiation of a bird control programme that included the use of border collies. Humans: Sometimes called "animated scarecrows," it was not uncommon for children to be employed to scare birds away from crops. They often used early forms of acoustic deterrents, such as clapping wood planks together.
See also
Bird control spike Bird netting Bird trapping Wildlife contraceptive
References
Text derived from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1352702131 under CC BY-SA 4.0; modifications have been made.