Lesson plan

bit player

actor who regularly performs in bit roles, either as a hobby or to earn a living; aspiring actor who has not yet broken into supporting or leading roles

Back to article

Article summary

actor who regularly performs in bit roles, either as a hobby or to earn a living; aspiring actor who has not yet broken into supporting or leading roles

Key claims

  1. P155: Q1416106 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
  2. P2283: Q14786283 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
  3. P2521: aktorka epizodyczna — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
  4. P2521: исполнительница эпизодической роли — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
  5. P2521: actriu menor — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
  6. P2521: epizodistka — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
  7. P2671: /g/1234nfqs — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
  8. P2671: /g/1q6j2x30r — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
  9. P279: Q658371 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
  10. P279: Q33999 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
  11. P31: Q28640 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95

Discussion questions

  1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
  2. The record states that the P155 is "Q1416106". What evidence would count against this claim?
  3. The record states that the P2283 is "Q14786283". What evidence would count against this claim?
  4. The record states that the P2521 is "aktorka epizodyczna". What evidence would count against this claim?
  5. The record states that the P2521 is "исполнительница эпизодической роли". What evidence would count against this claim?
  6. The record states that the P2521 is "actriu menor". What evidence would count against this claim?
  7. The record states that the P2521 is "epizodistka". What evidence would count against this claim?
  8. The record states that the P2671 is "/g/1234nfqs". What evidence would count against this claim?
  9. The record states that the P2671 is "/g/1q6j2x30r". What evidence would count against this claim?
  10. The record states that the P279 is "Q658371". What evidence would count against this claim?
  11. The record states that the P279 is "Q33999". What evidence would count against this claim?
  12. The record states that the P31 is "Q28640". What evidence would count against this claim?
  13. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
  14. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

No sources recorded.

Key claims and bibliography are generated from the same tracked claims and sources as the article page.