Blepephaeus

Article summary

Blepephaeus is a genus of longhorn beetles of the subfamily Lamiinae, containing the following species: * Blepephaeus agenor (Newman, 1842) * Blepephaeus andamanicus Breuning, 1935 * Blepephaeus annulatus Breuning, 1936 * Blepephaeus arrowi Breuning, 1935 * Blepephaeus bangalorensis Breuning, 1957 * Blepephaeus banksi Breuning, 1936 * Blepephaeus bipunctatus Breuning & de Jong, 1941 * Blepephaeus blairi Breuning, 1935 * Blepephaeus borneensis Breuning, 1944 * Blepephaeus fulvus (Pic, 1933) * Blepephaeus grisescens Hüdepohl, 1998 * Blepephaeus hiekei Breuning, 1974 * Blepephaeus higaononi Vives, 2009 * Blepephaeus indicus Breuning, 1935 * Blepephaeus infelix (Pascoe, 1856) * Blepephaeus irregularis (Heller, 1915) * Blepephaeus itzingeri Breuning, 1935 * Blepephaeus laosicus Breuning, 1947 * Blepephaeus lemoulti (Breuning, 1938) * Blepephaeus leucosticticus Breuning, 1938 * Blepephaeus lignosus Breuning, 1950 * Blepephaeus luteofasciatus (Gressitt, 1941) * Blepephaeus malaccensis Breuning, 1935 * Blepephaeus marmoratus Heller, 1934 * Blepephaeus marshalli Breuning, 1935 * Blepephaeus mausoni (Breuning, 1947) * Blepephaeus mindanaonis (Schultze, 1920) * Blepephaeus modicus (Gahan, 1888) * Blepephaeus multinotatus (Pic, 1925) * Blepephaeus nepalensis (Hayashi, 1981) * Blepephaeus niasicus Breuning, 1950 * Blepephaeus nicobaricus Breuning, 1935 * Blepephaeus nigrofasciatus Pu, 1999…

Key claims

No claims recorded.

Discussion questions

1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
2. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
3. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

No sources recorded.