Lesson plan

Chanka

The Chanka (or Chanca) were an ethnic group living in Pre-Columbian South America, whose chiefdom was part of the Chanka "confederation": a loose defensive alliance of various chiefdoms, such as the Vilcas, the Huancas, the Chancas, and the Poqras. From Catrovirreina, the Chanka migrated to the Andahuailas valley, defeated the local Quechua chiefdoms, and developed an important urban center and a chiefdom described in colonial writings as "rich and warmongering". According to María Rostworowski and Gonzalez Carré, attacks by Chanka groups led to the collapse of the Wari Empire. The Chanka chiefdom was ruled by two chiefs, the "Uscovilca" and the "Ancovilca", and waged war against the Soras and the Incas, and were defeated during the Inca-Chanka wars. Following the Incaic victory over the Chanka, the Soras were also subjected to Inca rule. However, the colonial-era ideas of a powerful Chanka entity are often called into question by various archaeologists, historians and anthropologists.

Back to article

Article summary

The Chanka (or Chanca) were an ethnic group living in Pre-Columbian South America, whose chiefdom was part of the Chanka "confederation": a loose defensive alliance of various chiefdoms, such as the Vilcas, the Huancas, the Chancas, and the Poqras. From Catrovirreina, the Chanka migrated to the Andahuailas valley, defeated the local Quechua chiefdoms, and developed an important urban center and a chiefdom described in colonial writings as "rich and warmongering". According to María Rostworowski and Gonzalez Carré, attacks by Chanka groups led to the collapse of the Wari Empire. The Chanka chiefdom was ruled by two chiefs, the "Uscovilca" and the "Ancovilca", and waged war against the Soras and the Incas, and were defeated during the Inca-Chanka wars. Following the Incaic victory over the Chanka, the Soras were also subjected to Inca rule. However, the colonial-era ideas of a powerful Chanka entity are often called into question by various archaeologists, historians and anthropologists.

Key claims

No claims recorded.

Discussion questions

  1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
  2. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
  3. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

No sources recorded.

Key claims and bibliography are generated from the same tracked claims and sources as the article page.