Circular reporting

Uses your system voice; voice and rate in settings.

Snapshot

≈ 2 min read

Names in other languages

No names in other languages are held for this entry yet.

Article bodies are English and are not machine-translated. A name in another language is not a translation of the article.

Circular reporting, or false confirmation, is a situation in source criticism where a piece of information appears to come from multiple independent sources, but in reality comes from only one source. In many cases, the problem happens mistakenly through sloppy reporting or intelligence-gathering. However, the situation can also be intentionally contrived by the source or reporter as a way of reinforcing the widespread belief in its information. Circular reporting occurs in a variety of fields, including intelligence gathering, journalism, and scholarly research. The case of the 2002 Niger uranium forgeries was a classic instance of circular reporting by intelligence agencies.

Circular reporting, or false confirmation, is a situation in source criticism where a piece of information appears to come from multiple independent sources, but in reality comes from only one source. In many cases, the problem happens mistakenly through sloppy reporting or intelligence-gathering. However, the situation can also be intentionally contrived by the source or reporter as a way of reinforcing the widespread belief in its information. Circular reporting occurs in a variety of fields, including intelligence gathering, journalism, and scholarly research. The case of the 2002 Niger uranium forgeries was a classic instance of circular reporting by intelligence agencies. ==Examples== ==See also== ==References==

Text derived from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1369695514 under CC BY-SA 4.0; modifications have been made.

Sources cited in this revision

Extracted from the cited revision's reference blocks; absent citations are not invented.