Dynamical decoupling

Dynamical decoupling (DD) is an open-loop quantum control technique employed in quantum computing to suppress decoherence by taking advantage of rapid, time-dependent control modulation. In its simplest form, DD is implemented by periodic sequences of instantaneous control pulses, whose net effect is to approximately average the unwanted system-environment coupling to zero. Different schemes exist for designing DD protocols that use realistic bounded-strength control pulses, as well as for achieving high-order error suppression, and for making DD compatible with quantum gates. Commonly used protocols range from the basic Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) sequence to more advanced, non-periodic sequences like Uhrig Dynamical Decoupling (UDD) and recursive, high-order schemes like Concatenated Dynamical Decoupling (CDD). They are based on the Hahn spin echo technique of applying periodic pulses to enable refocusing and hence extend the coherence times of qubits. Periodic repetition of suitable high-order DD sequences may be employed to engineer a 'stroboscopic saturation' of qubit coherence, or coherence plateau, that can persist in the presence of realistic noise spectra and experimental control imperfections. This permits device-independent, high-fidelity data storage for computationally useful periods with bounded error probability.…

Dynamical decoupling (DD) is an open-loop quantum control technique employed in quantum computing to suppress decoherence by taking advantage of rapid, time-dependent control modulation. In its simplest form, DD is implemented by periodic sequences of instantaneous control pulses, whose net effect is to approximately average the unwanted system-environment coupling to zero. Different schemes exist for designing DD protocols that use realistic bounded-strength control pulses, as well as for achieving high-order error suppression, and for making DD compatible with quantum gates. Commonly used protocols range from the basic Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) sequence to more advanced, non-periodic sequences like Uhrig Dynamical Decoupling (UDD) and recursive, high-order schemes like Concatenated Dynamical Decoupling (CDD). They are based on the Hahn spin echo technique of applying periodic pulses to enable refocusing and hence extend the coherence times of qubits. Periodic repetition of suitable high-order DD sequences may be employed to engineer a 'stroboscopic saturation' of qubit coherence, or coherence plateau, that can persist in the presence of realistic noise spectra and experimental control imperfections. This permits device-independent, high-fidelity data storage for computationally useful periods with bounded error probability. Dynamical decoupling has also been studied in a classical context for two coupled pendulums whose oscillation frequencies are modulated in time. Unlike periodic sequences, Uhrig Dynamical Decoupling (UDD) uses non-uniformly spaced π-pulses. The timing of the j-th pulse in a sequence of n pulses applied over a total time T is given by \delta_j = T \sin^2\left(\frac{\pi j}{2n+2}\right) . This specific timing is mathematically optimized to provide a high-order suppression of general dephasing noise, particularly for environments where the noise power spectrum has a sharp cutoff at high frequencies. For such noise spectra, UDD can achieve a higher fidelity with fewer pulses than periodic sequences like CPMG. It is a powerful example of how optimized, non-intuitive pulse timings can provide superior performance. H_\text{total}(t) = H_\text{sys} + H_\text{ctrl}(t) + H_\text{err} where H ctrl (t) represents the DD pulses and H err is the noise to be suppressed. The analysis proceeds by moving into an interaction picture defined by the control pulses, often called the toggling frame. In this frame, the error Hamiltonian is modulated by the control pulses: \tilde{H}_\text{err}(t) = U_c^\dagger(t) H_\text{err} U_c(t) where U_c(t) = \mathcal{T} \exp \left( -i \int_0^t H_\text{ctrl}(t') dt' \right) (with ħ=1). The effect of the pulses is to transform the error. For example, a perfect π-pulse around the x-axis transforms the dephasing error operator σ z into −σ z . This "sign-flipping" is the mechanism by which the error can be averaged away. The total evolution over one DD cycle of period T is difficult to calculate directly. The Magnus expansion is a tool that expresses this evolution in terms of the desired effective Hamiltonian: U_\text{err}(T) = \mathcal{T} \exp \left( -i \int_0^T \tilde{H}_\text{err}(t') dt' \right) = \exp(-i H_\text{eff} T) where H eff can be written as a series H eff = H (0) + H (1) + H (2) + … . The first two terms are: Zeroth-order term (the average Hamiltonian): H^{(0)} = \frac{1}{T} \int_0^T \tilde{H}_\text{err}(t) dt First-order term: H^{(1)} = \frac{-i}{2T} \int_0^T dt_2 \int_0^{t_2} dt_1 [\tilde{H}_\text{err}(t_2), \tilde{H}_\text{err}(t_1)] The design goal of a DD sequence is to make these terms vanish. A sequence that makes H (0) = 0 is considered a first-order decoupling sequence. Higher-order sequences like UDD or CDD are designed to make both H (0) and H (1) (and sometimes higher terms) simultaneously zero, offering better protection against noise.

References

Text derived from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1369613542 under CC BY-SA 4.0; modifications have been made.