Lesson plan

DySPAN

The Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks Standards Committee (DySPAN-SC), formerly Standards Coordinating Committee 41 (SCC41), and even earlier the IEEE P1900 Standards Committee, is sponsored by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The group develops standards for radio and spectrum management. Its working groups and resulting standards, numbered in the 1900 range, are sometimes referred to as IEEE 1900.X.

Back to article

Article summary

The Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks Standards Committee (DySPAN-SC), formerly Standards Coordinating Committee 41 (SCC41), and even earlier the IEEE P1900 Standards Committee, is sponsored by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). The group develops standards for radio and spectrum management. Its working groups and resulting standards, numbered in the 1900 range, are sometimes referred to as IEEE 1900.X.

Key claims

  1. date of establishment: 2005 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95
  2. publication date: 1900 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95
  3. publication date: 2009-02-27 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95
  4. publication date: 2011-04-22 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95
  5. publication date: 2009-02-27 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95

Discussion questions

  1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
  2. The record states that the date of establishment is "2005". What evidence would count against this claim?
  3. The record states that the publication date is "1900". What evidence would count against this claim?
  4. The record states that the publication date is "2009-02-27". What evidence would count against this claim?
  5. The record states that the publication date is "2011-04-22". What evidence would count against this claim?
  6. The record states that the publication date is "2009-02-27". What evidence would count against this claim?
  7. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
  8. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

  1. Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1247129992

Key claims and bibliography are generated from the same tracked claims and sources as the article page.