Halvaria

Uses your system voice; voice and rate in settings.

Snapshot

≈ 2 min read

Names in other languages

No names in other languages are held for this entry yet.

Article bodies are English and are not machine-translated. A name in another language is not a translation of the article.

Halvaria is a taxonomic grouping of protists that includes Alveolata and Stramenopiles (Heterokonta). Analyses in 2007 and 2008 revealed that the Stramenopiles and the Alveolata are related, and form a reduced clade of what were seen to be a paraphyletic group, the chromalveolates. The two clades together with the Rhizaria (originally one of the six major eukaryote groups) form a clade dubbed the SAR supergroup. A phylogenomic analysis from 2016 cast doubt on Halvaria, suggesting that Alveolata is the sister group to Rhizaria (making the R + A clade) through new rhizarian sequence data, and that support for Halvaria might be an artifact of low taxon sampling as well as long branch attraction. However, later analyses from 2021 support Halvaria as a solid clade.

Halvaria is a taxonomic grouping of protists that includes Alveolata and Stramenopiles (Heterokonta). Analyses in 2007 and 2008 revealed that the Stramenopiles and the Alveolata are related, and form a reduced clade of what were seen to be a paraphyletic group, the chromalveolates. The two clades together with the Rhizaria (originally one of the six major eukaryote groups) form a clade dubbed the SAR supergroup. A phylogenomic analysis from 2016 cast doubt on Halvaria, suggesting that Alveolata is the sister group to Rhizaria (making the R + A clade) through new rhizarian sequence data, and that support for Halvaria might be an artifact of low taxon sampling as well as long branch attraction. However, later analyses from 2021 support Halvaria as a solid clade.

Text derived from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1368842511 under CC BY-SA 4.0; modifications have been made.

Sources cited in this revision

No external citation was extracted for this revision. That is a statement about the source, not a claim that none exists.