Interpretability

Uses your system voice; voice and rate in settings.

Snapshot

≈ 1 min read

Names in other languages

No names in other languages are held for this entry yet.

Article bodies are English and are not machine-translated. A name in another language is not a translation of the article.

In mathematical logic, interpretability is a relation between formal theories that expresses the possibility of interpreting or translating one into the other.

In mathematical logic, interpretability is a relation between formal theories that expresses the possibility of interpreting or translating one into the other. ==Informal definition== Assume T and S are formal theories. Slightly simplified, T is said to be interpretable in S if and only if the language of T can be translated into the language of S in such a way that S proves the translation of every theorem of T. Of course, there are some natural conditions on admissible translations here, such as the necessity for a translation to preserve the logical structure of formulas. This concept, together with weak interpretability, was introduced by Alfred Tarski in 1953. Three other related concepts are cointerpretability, logical tolerance, and cotolerance, introduced by Giorgi Japaridze in 1992–93. ==See also== Conservative extension Interpretation (logic) Interpretation (model theory) Interpretability logic ==References== Japaridze, G., and De Jongh, D. (1998) "The logic of provability" in Buss, S., ed., Handbook of Proof Theory. North-Holland: 476–546. Alfred Tarski, Andrzej Mostowski, and Raphael Robinson (1953) Undecidable Theories. North-Holland.

Text derived from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1303976814 under CC BY-SA 4.0; modifications have been made.