Lesson plan

Jónsson function

In mathematical set theory, an ω-Jónsson function for a set x of ordinals is a function f:[x]^\omega\to x with the property that, for any subset y of x with the same cardinality as x, the restriction of f to [y]^\omega is surjective on x . Here [x]^\omega denotes the set of strictly increasing sequences of members of x , or equivalently the family of subsets of x with order type \omega , using a standard notation for the family of subsets with a given order type. Jónsson functions are named for Bjarni Jónsson. showed that for every ordinal λ there is an ω-Jónsson function for λ. Kunen's proof of Kunen's inconsistency theorem uses a Jónsson function for cardinals λ such that 2 λ = λ ℵ 0 , and Kunen observed that for this special case there is a simpler proof of the existence of Jónsson functions. gave a simple proof for the general case. The existence of Jónsson functions shows that for any cardinal there is an algebra with an infinitary operation that has no proper subalgebras of the same cardinality. In particular if infinitary operations are allowed then an analogue of Jónsson algebras exists in any cardinality, so there are no infinitary analogues of Jónsson cardinals.

Back to article

Article summary

In mathematical set theory, an ω-Jónsson function for a set x of ordinals is a function f:[x]^\omega\to x with the property that, for any subset y of x with the same cardinality as x, the restriction of f to [y]^\omega is surjective on x . Here [x]^\omega denotes the set of strictly increasing sequences of members of x , or equivalently the family of subsets of x with order type \omega , using a standard notation for the family of subsets with a given order type. Jónsson functions are named for Bjarni Jónsson. showed that for every ordinal λ there is an ω-Jónsson function for λ. Kunen's proof of Kunen's inconsistency theorem uses a Jónsson function for cardinals λ such that 2 λ = λ ℵ 0 , and Kunen observed that for this special case there is a simpler proof of the existence of Jónsson functions. gave a simple proof for the general case. The existence of Jónsson functions shows that for any cardinal there is an algebra with an infinitary operation that has no proper subalgebras of the same cardinality. In particular if infinitary operations are allowed then an analogue of Jónsson algebras exists in any cardinality, so there are no infinitary analogues of Jónsson cardinals.

Key claims

No claims recorded.

Discussion questions

  1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
  2. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
  3. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

No sources recorded.

Key claims and bibliography are generated from the same tracked claims and sources as the article page.