Kitami (train)

Uses your system voice; voice and rate in settings.

Snapshot

≈ 2 min read

Names in other languages

No names in other languages are held for this entry yet.

Article bodies are English and are not machine-translated. A name in another language is not a translation of the article.

The is a train service operated by Hokkaido Railway Company (JR Hokkaido) in Hokkaido, Japan, since 1988. It runs from to on the Sekihoku Main Line. Prior to the March 2025 timetable revision, it was classified as a train and only ran as far as .

The is a train service operated by Hokkaido Railway Company (JR Hokkaido) in Hokkaido, Japan, since 1988. It runs from to on the Sekihoku Main Line. Prior to the March 2025 timetable revision, it was classified as a train and only ran as far as .

Service pattern and station stops

There is one train per day in each direction, with the journey taking approximately 4 hours 30 minutes from Asahikawa to Abashiri. Trains stop at the following stations. (A28) ( ) (A29) ( ) (A30) ( ) (A31) ( ) (A32) ( ) (A34) (A35) (A43) (A45) (A48) (A50) (A51) (A53) (A56) (A57) (A58) (A59) (A60) Hakuyō (A61) Itoshino (A62) Tanno (A63) Hiushinai (A64) Bihoro (A65) Nishi-Memambetsu (A66) Memambetsu (A67) Yobito (A68) Abashiri (A69) Stations in brackets are only served by Kitami-bound (eastbound) trains.

Rolling stock

Services are formed of one or two single-car KiHa 54 diesel cars based at Asahikawa Depot. Very occasionally, KiHa 150 diesel trains may be used.

History

The Kitami service was first introduced from 19 March 1988 as a seasonal "special rapid" train service. From 3 November 1988, it became a regular daily service. From 13 March 2004, the train became entirely no-smoking. The service was extended from Kitami to Abashiri in 2025, and downgraded from "special rapid" to "rapid".

References

Text derived from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1318341939 under CC BY-SA 4.0; modifications have been made.

Sources cited in this revision

No external citation was extracted for this revision. That is a statement about the source, not a claim that none exists.