knowledge argument

Uses your system voice; voice and rate in settings.

Q1068312Snapshot

≈ 4 min read

Names in other languages

  • Englishknowledge argument
  • EspañolCuarto de Mary
  • РусскийКомната Марии
  • עבריתהחדר של מרי
  • etMary tuba
  • MagyarTudásérv
  • 日本語マリーの部屋
  • DeutschMary

Article bodies are English and are not machine-translated. A name in another language is not a translation of the article.

In philosophy of mind, the knowledge argument (also known as Mary's Room, Mary the Colour Scientist, or Mary the super-scientist) is a thought experiment proposed by Frank Jackson in his article "Epiphenomenal Qualia" (1982), and extended in "What Mary Didn't Know" (1986). The thought experiment describes Mary, a scientist who exists in a black-and-white world where she has extensive access to physical descriptions of color, but no actual perceptual experience of color. Mary has learned everything there is to learn about color, but she has never actually experienced it for herself. The central question of the thought experiment is whether Mary will gain new knowledge when she goes outside the colorless world and experiences seeing in color. The thought experiment is intended to argue against physicalism—the view that the universe, including all that is mental, is entirely physical. Jackson says that the "irresistible conclusion" is that "there are more properties than physicalists talk about". Jackson would eventually call himself a physicalist and say, in 2023, "I no longer accept the argument" though he feels that the argument should be "addressed really seriously if you are a physicalist".…

In philosophy of mind, the knowledge argument (also known as Mary's Room, Mary the Colour Scientist, or Mary the super-scientist) is a thought experiment proposed by Frank Jackson in his article "Epiphenomenal Qualia" (1982), and extended in "What Mary Didn't Know" (1986). The thought experiment describes Mary, a scientist who exists in a black-and-white world where she has extensive access to physical descriptions of color, but no actual perceptual experience of color. Mary has learned everything there is to learn about color, but she has never actually experienced it for herself. The central question of the thought experiment is whether Mary will gain new knowledge when she goes outside the colorless world and experiences seeing in color. The thought experiment is intended to argue against physicalism—the view that the universe, including all that is mental, is entirely physical. Jackson says that the "irresistible conclusion" is that "there are more properties than physicalists talk about". Jackson would eventually call himself a physicalist and say, in 2023, "I no longer accept the argument" though he feels that the argument should be "addressed really seriously if you are a physicalist". The debate that emerged following its publication became the subject of an edited volume, There's Something About Mary (2004), which includes replies from such philosophers as Daniel Dennett, David Lewis, and Paul Churchland. Mary's Room: A philosophical thought experiment, by Eleanor Nelsen on Ted-Ed "Frank Jackson, Latter Day Physicalist" a 2011 interview of Frank Jackson by James Garvey for The Philosophers' Magazine focused on "Mary's room" (Archived by Wayback Machine.)

Text derived from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1375254908 under CC BY-SA 4.0; modifications have been made.