Kudarkin

Uses your system voice; voice and rate in settings.

Snapshot

≈ 2 min read

Names in other languages

No names in other languages are held for this entry yet.

Article bodies are English and are not machine-translated. A name in another language is not a translation of the article.

Kudarkin was the title of a high-ranking official among the Oghuz Turks. The title is reported by ibn Fadlan, who passed through Oghuz territory in the early 920s CE. Ibn Fadlan described the Kudarkin as the deputy of the Oghuz yabghu or khan; the position may have been analogous to the Khagan Bek of the Khazars. The Kudarkin's authority was not universally recognized among the Oghuz. When ibn Fadlan was waylaid by an Oghuz tribesman, the Arab emissary attempted to convince tribesman to let him pass by claiming to be a friend of the Kudarkin but was told by the man "I shit on the Kudarkin's beard." Krachkovsky conjectured that the title should actually be read "Kudar-Khan".

Kudarkin was the title of a high-ranking official among the Oghuz Turks. The title is reported by ibn Fadlan, who passed through Oghuz territory in the early 920s CE. Ibn Fadlan described the Kudarkin as the deputy of the Oghuz yabghu or khan; the position may have been analogous to the Khagan Bek of the Khazars. The Kudarkin's authority was not universally recognized among the Oghuz. When ibn Fadlan was waylaid by an Oghuz tribesman, the Arab emissary attempted to convince tribesman to let him pass by claiming to be a friend of the Kudarkin but was told by the man "I shit on the Kudarkin's beard." Krachkovsky conjectured that the title should actually be read "Kudar-Khan".

References

Dunlop, Douglas M. The History of the Jewish Khazars, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1954. Krachkovsky, I.J., transl. Ibn Fadlan's Travel to Volga. Leningrad, 1939.

Text derived from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1191373794 under CC BY-SA 4.0; modifications have been made.

Sources cited in this revision

No external citation was extracted for this revision. That is a statement about the source, not a claim that none exists.