Learie Constantine

Article summary

Learie Nicholas Constantine, Baron Constantine (21 September 1901 1 July 1971) was a Trinidadian cricketer, lawyer and politician who served as Trinidad and Tobago's High Commissioner to the United Kingdom and became the UK's first black peer. He played 18 Test matches for the West Indies before the Second World War and took the team's first wicket in Test cricket. An advocate against racial discrimination, in later life he was influential in the passing of the 1965 Race Relations Act in Britain. He was knighted in 1962 and made a life peer in 1969. Born in Trinidad, Constantine established an early reputation as a promising cricketer, and was a member of the West Indies teams that toured England in 1923 and 1928. Unhappy at the lack of opportunities for black people in Trinidad, he decided to pursue a career as a professional cricketer in England, and during the 1928 tour was awarded a contract with the Lancashire League club Nelson. He played for the club with distinction between 1929 and 1938, while continuing as a member of the West Indies Test team in tours of England and Australia. Although his record as a Test cricketer was less impressive than in other cricket, he helped to establish a uniquely West Indian style of play. He was chosen as one of the Wisden Cricketers of the Year in 1939.…

Key claims

1. date of birth: 1923 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95
2. date of birth: 1901-09-21 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95
3. date of birth: 1928 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95
4. date of death: 1971-07-01 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95
5. date of death: 1971 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95
6. publication date: 1933 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95
7. publication date: 1954 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95
8. publication date: 1975 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95

Discussion questions

1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
2. The record states that the date of birth is "1923". What evidence would count against this claim?
3. The record states that the date of birth is "1901-09-21". What evidence would count against this claim?
4. The record states that the date of birth is "1928". What evidence would count against this claim?
5. The record states that the date of death is "1971-07-01". What evidence would count against this claim?
6. The record states that the date of death is "1971". What evidence would count against this claim?
7. The record states that the publication date is "1933". What evidence would count against this claim?
8. The record states that the publication date is "1954". What evidence would count against this claim?
9. The record states that the publication date is "1975". What evidence would count against this claim?
10. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
11. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

1. Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1371411378