Lesson plan

Nullifier Party

The State Rights and Free Trade Party, commonly known as the Nullifier Party, was a political party in Antebellum South Carolina. It was one of two main political parties in South Carolina during the 1830s, alongside the Union Party. The party defended the legal theory of nullification, which held that states could unilaterally declare federal laws unconstitutional. John C. Calhoun anonymously published the South Carolina Exposition and Protest in response to the Tariff of Abominations, which dramatically increased the rate of tax on imported raw materials. The Exposition went beyond the earlier Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions in asserting the right of the states to nullify unconstitutional laws. Calhoun claimed that the severe harm done by the tariff to South Carolina's plantation economy justified the step of nullification. Calhoun's ideas were notable for their proslavery emphasis; likeminded contemporaries portrayed the tariff as an abolitionist conspiracy and a vital threat to the planter class. While Calhoun made a formal distinction between nullification and secession, opponents accused him of advocating disunion. Nullifiers outperformed expectations in the 1830 legislative elections, holding the Unionists to narrow majorities in six contested Charleston districts.…

Back to article

Article summary

The State Rights and Free Trade Party, commonly known as the Nullifier Party, was a political party in Antebellum South Carolina. It was one of two main political parties in South Carolina during the 1830s, alongside the Union Party. The party defended the legal theory of nullification, which held that states could unilaterally declare federal laws unconstitutional. John C. Calhoun anonymously published the South Carolina Exposition and Protest in response to the Tariff of Abominations, which dramatically increased the rate of tax on imported raw materials. The Exposition went beyond the earlier Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions in asserting the right of the states to nullify unconstitutional laws. Calhoun claimed that the severe harm done by the tariff to South Carolina's plantation economy justified the step of nullification. Calhoun's ideas were notable for their proslavery emphasis; likeminded contemporaries portrayed the tariff as an abolitionist conspiracy and a vital threat to the planter class. While Calhoun made a formal distinction between nullification and secession, opponents accused him of advocating disunion. Nullifiers outperformed expectations in the 1830 legislative elections, holding the Unionists to narrow majorities in six contested Charleston districts.…

Key claims

No claims recorded.

Discussion questions

  1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
  2. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
  3. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

No sources recorded.

Key claims and bibliography are generated from the same tracked claims and sources as the article page.