Lesson plan

Operation Echo

Operation Echo was the codename given by the Canadian Forces for its air activities during the Kosovo War in 1999. In support of the NATO Operation Allied Force Canadian aircraft based at Aviano Air Base in northeastern Italy flew bombing missions over the Balkans. During the campaign the Canadian air contingent consisted of 18 CF-18 Hornet aircraft from 441 and 425 Tactical Fighter Squadrons, with 69 aircrew and 250 ground crew. 945 sorties were originally planned, however 176 were cancelled due to weather, 85 were cancelled due to "operational factors" and 6 were cancelled due to maintenance issues. 678 sorties went ahead, with 120 combat air patrols and 558 ground attacks. Bombs were dropped during 224 of them, totalling nearly of gravity and precision-guided bombs, which hit their targets 70% of the time. While Canadian forces comprised less than 2% of the nearly 1,000 Allied aircraft engaged in the conflict, they flew on 10% of all bombing missions.

Back to article

Article summary

Operation Echo was the codename given by the Canadian Forces for its air activities during the Kosovo War in 1999. In support of the NATO Operation Allied Force Canadian aircraft based at Aviano Air Base in northeastern Italy flew bombing missions over the Balkans. During the campaign the Canadian air contingent consisted of 18 CF-18 Hornet aircraft from 441 and 425 Tactical Fighter Squadrons, with 69 aircrew and 250 ground crew. 945 sorties were originally planned, however 176 were cancelled due to weather, 85 were cancelled due to "operational factors" and 6 were cancelled due to maintenance issues. 678 sorties went ahead, with 120 combat air patrols and 558 ground attacks. Bombs were dropped during 224 of them, totalling nearly of gravity and precision-guided bombs, which hit their targets 70% of the time. While Canadian forces comprised less than 2% of the nearly 1,000 Allied aircraft engaged in the conflict, they flew on 10% of all bombing missions.

Key claims

No claims recorded.

Discussion questions

  1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
  2. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
  3. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

No sources recorded.

Key claims and bibliography are generated from the same tracked claims and sources as the article page.