Pidonia

Article summary

Pidonia is a genus of beetles in the family Cerambycidae, containing the following species: * Pidonia aenipennis (Gressitt, 1935) * Pidonia aegrota (Bates, 1884) * Pidonia aestivalis Kuboki, 1994 * Pidonia albomaculata (Matsushita, 1931) * Pidonia alpina An & Kwon, 1991 * Pidonia alsophila Kuboki, 1977 * Pidonia alticollis (Kraatz, 1879) * Pidonia amabilis Kuboki, 1980 * Pidonia amentata (Bates, 1884) * Pidonia amurensis Pic, 1900 * Pidonia angustata Kuboki, 1994 * Pidonia anmashana Kuboki, 1993 * Pidonia approximata Kuboki, 1977 * Pidonia armata Holzschuh, 1991 * Pidonia atripennis Hayashi, 1978 * Pidonia atritarsis Holzschuh, 2013 * Pidonia aurata (Horn, 1860) * Pidonia balteata Holzschuh, 2013 * Pidonia benesi Holzschuh, 1998 * Pidonia binigrosignata Hayashi, 1974 * Pidonia bispina Holzschuh, 1998 * Pidonia bivittata Saito, 1980 * Pidonia bouvieri Pic, 1901 * Pidonia businskyorum Holzschuh, 1998 * Pidonia chairo Tamanuki, 1942 * Pidonia changi Hayashi, 1971 * Pidonia chiaomui Kuboki, 1995 * Pidonia chienhsingi Kuboki, 1995 * Pidonia chinensis Hayashi & Villiers, 1985 * Pidonia confusa Saito, 1980 * Pidonia chui Chou, 1998 * Pidonia chujoi Ohbayashi & Hayashi, 1960 * Pidonia compta Holzschuh, 1998 * Pidonia cuprescens Holzschuh, 1991 * Pidonia dealbata Kuboki, 1981 * Pidonia debilis (Kraatz, 1879) * Pidonia densicollis (Casey, 1914) * Pidonia dentipes Holzschuh, 1998 * Pidoni…

Key claims

No claims recorded.

Discussion questions

1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
2. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
3. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

No sources recorded.