Lesson plan

Pyrenae

Pyrenae, Revista de Prehistòria i Antiguitat de la Mediterrània Occidental / Journal of Western Mediterranean Prehistory and Antiquity, is a biannual peer-reviewed academic journal of archaeology published by the Secció de Prehistòria i Arqueologia (Section of Prehistory and Archaeology) of the University of Barcelona. The journal focuses a chronological framework that ranges from prehistory to the beginning of the Middle Ages, especially in the Western Mediterranean. The editor-in-chief is Gisela Ripoll.

Back to article

Article summary

Pyrenae, Revista de Prehistòria i Antiguitat de la Mediterrània Occidental / Journal of Western Mediterranean Prehistory and Antiquity, is a biannual peer-reviewed academic journal of archaeology published by the Secció de Prehistòria i Arqueologia (Section of Prehistory and Archaeology) of the University of Barcelona. The journal focuses a chronological framework that ranges from prehistory to the beginning of the Middle Ages, especially in the Western Mediterranean. The editor-in-chief is Gisela Ripoll.

Key claims

  1. date of establishment: 1965 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95
  2. publication date: 1976 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95
  3. publication date: 1983 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95
  4. publication date: 2002 — source: Wikipedia · confidence 0.95

Discussion questions

  1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
  2. The record states that the date of establishment is "1965". What evidence would count against this claim?
  3. The record states that the publication date is "1976". What evidence would count against this claim?
  4. The record states that the publication date is "1983". What evidence would count against this claim?
  5. The record states that the publication date is "2002". What evidence would count against this claim?
  6. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
  7. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

  1. Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1336106591

Key claims and bibliography are generated from the same tracked claims and sources as the article page.