REG1

Uses your system voice; voice and rate in settings.

Snapshot

≈ 2 min read

Names in other languages

No names in other languages are held for this entry yet.

Article bodies are English and are not machine-translated. A name in another language is not a translation of the article.

REG1 is an anticoagulation system consisting of two drugs: pegnivacogin, a single-stranded 31-nucleotide aptamer that binds and inhibits Factor IXa, and anivamersen, a complementary sequence reversal 15-nucleotide control agent. REG1 mechanism of action It involves inhibition of Factor IXa. REG1 is being developed for use in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. REG1 is associated with severe allergic reactions. In the phase 2b RADAR trial, 12 allergic-like reactions occurred shortly after administration of pegnivacogin in three patients with histories of allergy. In one clinical trial, it was found that there was no evidence that REG1 reduced ischaemic events or bleeding compared with bivalirudin.

REG1 is an anticoagulation system consisting of two drugs: pegnivacogin, a single-stranded 31-nucleotide aptamer that binds and inhibits Factor IXa, and anivamersen, a complementary sequence reversal 15-nucleotide control agent. REG1 mechanism of action It involves inhibition of Factor IXa. REG1 is being developed for use in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. REG1 is associated with severe allergic reactions. In the phase 2b RADAR trial, 12 allergic-like reactions occurred shortly after administration of pegnivacogin in three patients with histories of allergy. In one clinical trial, it was found that there was no evidence that REG1 reduced ischaemic events or bleeding compared with bivalirudin. ==References==

Text derived from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1313585384 under CC BY-SA 4.0; modifications have been made.

Sources cited in this revision

No external citation was extracted for this revision. That is a statement about the source, not a claim that none exists.