Lesson plan

Scaline

, the most well-known scaline psychedelic. A scaline, also known as a substituted mescaline analogue and typically but not always a 4-substituted 3,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine, is an analogue of the phenethylamine serotonergic psychedelic mescaline (3,4,5-trimethoxyphenethylamine). Other related compounds include the 2C (4-substituted 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine) and DOx (4-substituted 2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine) compounds as well as 3,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine (TMA) and other 4-substituted 3,5-dimethoxyamphetamines (3C drugs). They are also mescaline analogues, but the 2C and DOx drugs have a methoxy group at the 2 position instead of the 3 position of the phenyl ring, while TMA is an amphetamine rather than a phenethylamine. The pharmacology of mescaline analogues has been studied. Mescaline analogues, or 4-substituted 3,5-dimethoxyphenethylamines specifically, tend to be much less potent than the 2C and DOx drugs. This relates to the fact that the 2,4,5-substitution pattern tends to be optimal in terms of receptor affinity and potency. However, mescaline analogues are frequently much more potent than mescaline.…

Back to article

Article summary

, the most well-known scaline psychedelic. A scaline, also known as a substituted mescaline analogue and typically but not always a 4-substituted 3,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine, is an analogue of the phenethylamine serotonergic psychedelic mescaline (3,4,5-trimethoxyphenethylamine). Other related compounds include the 2C (4-substituted 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine) and DOx (4-substituted 2,5-dimethoxyamphetamine) compounds as well as 3,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine (TMA) and other 4-substituted 3,5-dimethoxyamphetamines (3C drugs). They are also mescaline analogues, but the 2C and DOx drugs have a methoxy group at the 2 position instead of the 3 position of the phenyl ring, while TMA is an amphetamine rather than a phenethylamine. The pharmacology of mescaline analogues has been studied. Mescaline analogues, or 4-substituted 3,5-dimethoxyphenethylamines specifically, tend to be much less potent than the 2C and DOx drugs. This relates to the fact that the 2,4,5-substitution pattern tends to be optimal in terms of receptor affinity and potency. However, mescaline analogues are frequently much more potent than mescaline.…

Key claims

No claims recorded.

Discussion questions

  1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
  2. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
  3. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

No sources recorded.

Key claims and bibliography are generated from the same tracked claims and sources as the article page.