Lesson plan

Singular submodule

In the branches of abstract algebra known as ring theory and module theory, each right (resp. left) M has a singular submodule consisting of elements whose annihilators are essential right (resp. left) ideals in R. In set notation it is usually denoted as \mathcal{Z}(M) = \{m\in M \mid \mathrm{ann}(m) \subseteq_e R\}\, . For general rings, \mathcal{Z}(M) is a good generalization of the torsion submodule tors(M) which is most often defined for domains. In the case that R is a commutative domain, \operatorname{tors}(M) = \mathcal{Z}(M) . If R is any ring, \mathcal{Z}(R_R) is defined considering R as a right module, and in this case \mathcal{Z}(R_R) is a two-sided ideal of R called the right singular ideal of R. The left handed analogue \mathcal{Z}(_R R) is defined similarly. It is possible for \mathcal{Z}(R_R) \neq \mathcal{Z}(_R R) .

Back to article

Article summary

In the branches of abstract algebra known as ring theory and module theory, each right (resp. left) M has a singular submodule consisting of elements whose annihilators are essential right (resp. left) ideals in R. In set notation it is usually denoted as \mathcal{Z}(M) = \{m\in M \mid \mathrm{ann}(m) \subseteq_e R\}\, . For general rings, \mathcal{Z}(M) is a good generalization of the torsion submodule tors(M) which is most often defined for domains. In the case that R is a commutative domain, \operatorname{tors}(M) = \mathcal{Z}(M) . If R is any ring, \mathcal{Z}(R_R) is defined considering R as a right module, and in this case \mathcal{Z}(R_R) is a two-sided ideal of R called the right singular ideal of R. The left handed analogue \mathcal{Z}(_R R) is defined similarly. It is possible for \mathcal{Z}(R_R) \neq \mathcal{Z}(_R R) .

Key claims

No claims recorded.

Discussion questions

  1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
  2. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
  3. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

No sources recorded.

Key claims and bibliography are generated from the same tracked claims and sources as the article page.