Squeeze operator

Article summary

In quantum physics, the squeeze operator for a single mode of the electromagnetic field is : \hat{S}(z) = \exp \left ( {1 \over 2} (z^* \hat{a}^2 - z \hat{a}^{\dagger 2}) \right ) , \qquad z = r \, e^{i\theta} where the operators inside the exponential are the ladder operators. It is a unitary operator and therefore obeys S(z)\,S^\dagger (z) = S^\dagger (z)\,S(z) = \hat 1 , where \hat 1 is the identity operator. Its action on the annihilation and creation operators produces : \hat{S}^{\dagger}(z) \, \hat{a} \, \hat{S}(z) = \hat{a}\cosh r - e^{i\theta} \hat{a}^{\dagger} \sinh r \qquad\text{and}\qquad \hat{S}^{\dagger}(z) \, \hat{a}^{\dagger} \, \hat{S}(z) = \hat{a}^{\dagger}\cosh r - e^{-i\theta} \hat{a} \sinh r The squeeze operator is ubiquitous in quantum optics and can operate on any state. For example, when acting upon the vacuum, the squeezing operator produces the squeezed vacuum state. The squeezing operator can also act on coherent states and produce squeezed coherent states. The squeezing operator does not commute with the displacement operator: : \hat{S}(z) \hat{D}(\alpha) \neq \hat{D}(\alpha) \hat{S}(z), nor does it commute with the ladder operators, so one must pay close attention to how the operators are used.…

Key claims

No claims recorded.

Discussion questions

1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
2. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
3. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

No sources recorded.