Lesson plan

Stirling transform

In combinatorial mathematics, the Stirling transform of a sequence { a n : n = 1, 2, 3, ... } of numbers is the sequence { b n : n = 1, 2, 3, ... } given by : b_n=\sum_{k=1}^n \left\{\begin{matrix} n \\ k \end{matrix} \right\} a_k , where \left\{\begin{matrix} n \\ k \end{matrix} \right\} is the Stirling number of the second kind, which is the number of partitions of a set of size n into k parts. This is a linear sequence transformation. The inverse transform is : a_n=\sum_{k=1}^n (-1)^{n-k} \left[{n \atop k}\right] b_k , where (-1)^{n-k} \left[{n\atop k}\right] is a signed Stirling number of the first kind, where the unsigned \left[{n\atop k}\right] can be defined as the number of permutations on n elements with k cycles. Berstein and Sloane (cited below) state "If a n is the number of objects in some class with points labeled 1, 2, ..., n (with all labels distinct, i.e. ordinary labeled structures), then b n is the number of objects with points labeled 1, 2, ..., n (with repetitions allowed)." If : f(x) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty {a_n \over n!} x^n is a formal power series, and : g(x) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty {b_n \over n!} x^n with a n and b n as above, then : g(x) = f(e^x-1) . Likewise, the inverse transform leads to the generating function identity : f(x) = g(\log(1+x)) .

Back to article

Article summary

In combinatorial mathematics, the Stirling transform of a sequence { a n : n = 1, 2, 3, ... } of numbers is the sequence { b n : n = 1, 2, 3, ... } given by : b_n=\sum_{k=1}^n \left\{\begin{matrix} n \\ k \end{matrix} \right\} a_k , where \left\{\begin{matrix} n \\ k \end{matrix} \right\} is the Stirling number of the second kind, which is the number of partitions of a set of size n into k parts. This is a linear sequence transformation. The inverse transform is : a_n=\sum_{k=1}^n (-1)^{n-k} \left[{n \atop k}\right] b_k , where (-1)^{n-k} \left[{n\atop k}\right] is a signed Stirling number of the first kind, where the unsigned \left[{n\atop k}\right] can be defined as the number of permutations on n elements with k cycles. Berstein and Sloane (cited below) state "If a n is the number of objects in some class with points labeled 1, 2, ..., n (with all labels distinct, i.e. ordinary labeled structures), then b n is the number of objects with points labeled 1, 2, ..., n (with repetitions allowed)." If : f(x) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty {a_n \over n!} x^n is a formal power series, and : g(x) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty {b_n \over n!} x^n with a n and b n as above, then : g(x) = f(e^x-1) . Likewise, the inverse transform leads to the generating function identity : f(x) = g(\log(1+x)) .

Key claims

No claims recorded.

Discussion questions

  1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
  2. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
  3. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

No sources recorded.

Key claims and bibliography are generated from the same tracked claims and sources as the article page.