Lesson plan

Stuart A. Wright

Stuart A. Wright is an American sociology professor and author. He is the former College of Arts & Sciences (COAS) Research Professor in Sociology and now emeritus professor of sociology in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology at Lamar University in Beaumont, Texas. His book Patriots, Politics, and the Oklahoma City Bombing examines the right-wing groups that facilitated the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. Wright went on to work on the legal defense team for Timothy McVeigh, arguing against his characterization as a "lone wolf". In an article in the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Wright sought to defend the criminal actions of the Rajneesh movement, including the 1984 Rajneeshee bioterror attack. Wright depicts the group as the victim of bias, and claims that immigration authorities were manipulated into performing their normal role, even though the group was found by authorities to be involved in a record number of cases of immigration fraud.

Back to article

Article summary

Stuart A. Wright is an American sociology professor and author. He is the former College of Arts & Sciences (COAS) Research Professor in Sociology and now emeritus professor of sociology in the Department of Sociology and Anthropology at Lamar University in Beaumont, Texas. His book Patriots, Politics, and the Oklahoma City Bombing examines the right-wing groups that facilitated the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. Wright went on to work on the legal defense team for Timothy McVeigh, arguing against his characterization as a "lone wolf". In an article in the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Wright sought to defend the criminal actions of the Rajneesh movement, including the 1984 Rajneeshee bioterror attack. Wright depicts the group as the victim of bias, and claims that immigration authorities were manipulated into performing their normal role, even though the group was found by authorities to be involved in a record number of cases of immigration fraud.

Key claims

No claims recorded.

Discussion questions

  1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
  2. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
  3. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

No sources recorded.

Key claims and bibliography are generated from the same tracked claims and sources as the article page.