Thomaskerk

Article summary

church building in Katlijk, Netherlands

Key claims

1. P1004: 1f649eb8-184c-4e85-b05b-2f625263eab9 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
2. P127: Q2670934 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
3. P131: Q574558 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
4. P1343: Q134504988 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
5. P1435: Q916333 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
6. P17: Q55 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
7. P18: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Zuidgevel%20-%20Katlijk%20-%2020124051%20-%20RCE.jpg — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
8. P2671: /g/11_pkz0d4 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
9. P276: Q3112106 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
10. P281: 8455JR — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
11. P31: Q16970 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
12. P359: 21180 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
13. P373: Thomaskerk, Katlijk — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
14. P571: 1525-01-01T00:00:00Z — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
15. P625: Point(6.010833 52.949167) — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
16. P6375: Kerkelaan 20 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
17. P669: Q19294088 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
18. P793: Q1370468 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
19. P856: https://katlijk-mildam.protestantsekerk.net/ — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
20. P8897: 143063 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95
21. P8911: 16249 — source: Wikidata · confidence 0.95

Discussion questions

1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
2. The record states that the P1004 is "1f649eb8-184c-4e85-b05b-2f625263eab9". What evidence would count against this claim?
3. The record states that the P127 is "Q2670934". What evidence would count against this claim?
4. The record states that the P131 is "Q574558". What evidence would count against this claim?
5. The record states that the P1343 is "Q134504988". What evidence would count against this claim?
6. The record states that the P1435 is "Q916333". What evidence would count against this claim?
7. The record states that the P17 is "Q55". What evidence would count against this claim?
8. The record states that the P18 is "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Zuidgevel%20-%20Katlijk%20-%2020124051%20-%20RCE.jpg". What evidence would count against this claim?
9. The record states that the P2671 is "/g/11_pkz0d4". What evidence would count against this claim?
10. The record states that the P276 is "Q3112106". What evidence would count against this claim?
11. The record states that the P281 is "8455JR". What evidence would count against this claim?
12. The record states that the P31 is "Q16970". What evidence would count against this claim?
13. The record states that the P359 is "21180". What evidence would count against this claim?
14. The record states that the P373 is "Thomaskerk, Katlijk". What evidence would count against this claim?
15. The record states that the P571 is "1525-01-01T00:00:00Z". What evidence would count against this claim?
16. The record states that the P625 is "Point(6.010833 52.949167)". What evidence would count against this claim?
17. The record states that the P6375 is "Kerkelaan 20". What evidence would count against this claim?
18. The record states that the P669 is "Q19294088". What evidence would count against this claim?
19. The record states that the P793 is "Q1370468". What evidence would count against this claim?
20. The record states that the P856 is "https://katlijk-mildam.protestantsekerk.net/". What evidence would count against this claim?
21. The record states that the P8897 is "143063". What evidence would count against this claim?
22. The record states that the P8911 is "16249". What evidence would count against this claim?
23. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
24. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

No sources recorded.