Lesson plan

Universal graph

In mathematics, a universal graph is an infinite graph that contains every finite (or at-most-countable) graph as an induced subgraph. A universal graph of this type was first constructed by Richard Rado and is now called the Rado graph or random graph. More recent work has focused on universal graphs for a graph family : that is, an infinite graph belonging to that contains all finite graphs in . For instance, the Henson graphs are universal in this sense for the -clique-free graphs. A universal graph for a family of graphs can also refer to a member of a sequence of finite graphs that contains all graphs in ; for instance, every finite tree is a subgraph of a sufficiently large hypercube graph so a hypercube can be said to be a universal graph for trees. However it is not the smallest such graph: it is known that there is a universal graph for -vertex trees, with only vertices and edges, and that this is optimal. A construction based on the planar separator theorem can be used to show that -vertex planar graphs have universal graphs with edges, and that bounded-degree planar graphs have universal graphs with edges. It is also possible to construct universal graphs for planar graphs that have vertices. Sumner's conjecture states that tournaments are universal for polytrees, in the sense that every tournament with vertices contains every polytree with vertices as a subgraph.…

Back to article

Article summary

In mathematics, a universal graph is an infinite graph that contains every finite (or at-most-countable) graph as an induced subgraph. A universal graph of this type was first constructed by Richard Rado and is now called the Rado graph or random graph. More recent work has focused on universal graphs for a graph family : that is, an infinite graph belonging to that contains all finite graphs in . For instance, the Henson graphs are universal in this sense for the -clique-free graphs. A universal graph for a family of graphs can also refer to a member of a sequence of finite graphs that contains all graphs in ; for instance, every finite tree is a subgraph of a sufficiently large hypercube graph so a hypercube can be said to be a universal graph for trees. However it is not the smallest such graph: it is known that there is a universal graph for -vertex trees, with only vertices and edges, and that this is optimal. A construction based on the planar separator theorem can be used to show that -vertex planar graphs have universal graphs with edges, and that bounded-degree planar graphs have universal graphs with edges. It is also possible to construct universal graphs for planar graphs that have vertices. Sumner's conjecture states that tournaments are universal for polytrees, in the sense that every tournament with vertices contains every polytree with vertices as a subgraph.…

Key claims

No claims recorded.

Discussion questions

  1. Summarise the article in your own words. Which single claim would you verify first, and why?
  2. Which claim in this article is most likely to be revised as the sources update? How would you check its current status?
  3. If two sources disagreed about one of these facts, what would you need in order to trust one over the other?

Bibliography

No sources recorded.

Key claims and bibliography are generated from the same tracked claims and sources as the article page.