Value-action gap

Uses your system voice; voice and rate in settings.

Snapshot

≈ 4 min read

Names in other languages

No names in other languages are held for this entry yet.

Article bodies are English and are not machine-translated. A name in another language is not a translation of the article.

serves as an example of the value-action gap. Extensive market research showed that consumers would buy and enjoy the drink (values) but in reality, once it appeared in shops, not enough people bought it (action). This demonstrates the difference between what people say and what people do The value-action gap (also called the attitude-behaviour gap, intention-behaviour gap, intention-action gap, say-do gap, belief-action gap, KAP-gap (knowledge-attitudes-practice gap) or belief-behaviour gap) is the discrepancy between the stated values of an individual or organisation and their actions. More generally, it is the difference between what people say and what people do. The phrase is associated with environmental geography, relating to attitudes and behaviours surrounding environmental issues. Numerous studies have reported an increase in global environmental concern, but have shown that environmental engagement is not adjusting in accordance. Debates surrounding the issue of the value-action gap have mainly taken place within environmental and social psychology and research is often based within cognitive theories of how attitudes are formed and how this affects individuals' behaviour.…

serves as an example of the value-action gap. Extensive market research showed that consumers would buy and enjoy the drink (values) but in reality, once it appeared in shops, not enough people bought it (action). This demonstrates the difference between what people say and what people do]] The value-action gap (also called the attitude-behaviour gap, intention-behaviour gap, intention-action gap, say-do gap, belief-action gap, KAP-gap (knowledge-attitudes-practice gap) or belief-behaviour gap) is the discrepancy between the stated values of an individual or organisation and their actions. More generally, it is the difference between what people say and what people do. The phrase is associated with environmental geography, relating to attitudes and behaviours surrounding environmental issues. Numerous studies have reported an increase in global environmental concern, but have shown that environmental engagement is not adjusting in accordance. Debates surrounding the issue of the value-action gap have mainly taken place within environmental and social psychology and research is often based within cognitive theories of how attitudes are formed and how this affects individuals' behaviour. Pro-environmental behaviour is a term often used in the literature, which can be defined as behaviour that consciously seeks to minimise the negative impact of one's actions on the natural and built world. Research on the factors that influence behaviour, however, have received far less attention than institutional factors such as governments and industries. The research suggests that there are many internal and external factors that affect behaviour and the reasons behind consumer choices. Therefore, it can be difficult to identify the exact reasons for why this gap exists. When purchasing a product for example, many attributes are assessed by the purchaser in order to make their decision such as; price, quality, convenience, and brand familiarity. These factors influence the reasons behind buying behaviour and environmental considerations are often not taken into account, regardless of the attitudes people have regarding the environment. Overcoming this gap is of particular importance for environmental policies as finding ways to overcome it should increase the effectiveness of these strategies. This would lead to a fundamental shift in behaviour towards the environment and individuals' use of natural resources, ensuring sustainable development and conservation of the environment. When considering the importance of individual behaviour, it has been stated that national policies and major energy transformations often take decades to change locked-in infrastructure and institutions, but behavioural shifts have the potential to be more rapid and widespread. Additionally, individual behavior ultimately drives societal change via adoption of lifestyle changes and technologies, and support for environmental policies.

References

Text derived from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1360927436 under CC BY-SA 4.0; modifications have been made.

Sources cited in this revision

Extracted from the cited revision's reference blocks; absent citations are not invented.